Benim gördüğüm hiçbir kısacı Sony tavsiye etmez, etmedi.

Neden peki? Çok bilgim olmadığı için ben yakalayamıyorum ayrıntıları.. Etmiyorlarsa vardır bir bildikleri ama o bildikleri nedir? Bunu öğrensek biz de gönül rahatlığıyla HV30 alsak ya da o kadar kusur olur deyip sevdamızdan vazgeçmesek:) Ama işte ne kadar kusur?

Sony has actually increased the HDR-HC9E's lux rating (a measure of lowlight sensitivity) to 5, where the HDR-HC5E and HDR-HC7E were rated at a more sensitive 2. In the equivalent of a living room lit by a 100W ceiling light (quite a common shooting situation for home video makers), the Sony still maintains a good colour balance, with plenty of saturation and just a hint of the duller conditions. However, if you compare this to what the Canon HV20 can achieve with gain on maximum and 25p shooting mode enabled, the HDR-HC9E's image is not as clean and detailed. A bluish grain is visible, which reduces clarity. With the light reduced still further (to the equivalent of a nearby candle), most of the colour information is lost, although dropping the shutter speed to 1/25th improves this considerably. However, the bluish grain also increases, further reducing detail.

Although the HDR-HDC9E offers great image quality in all but the worst illumination, Canon's HV20 beats it in this respect, and the very similar HV30 is likely to as well. The Canons also have more features for the budding professional, as well. So the HDR-HC9E is a great high-end choice for point-and-shoot HD video, but not one for more serious usage.

http://www.trustedreviews.com/camcorders/review/2008/03/08/Sony-HDR-HC9E-HDV-Camcorder/p3

Sony has actually increased the HDR-HC9E's lux rating (a measure of lowlight sensitivity) to 5, where the HDR-HC5E and HDR-HC7E were rated at a more sensitive 2. In the equivalent of a living room lit by a 100W ceiling light (quite a common shooting situation for home video makers), the Sony still maintains a good colour balance, with plenty of saturation and just a hint of the duller conditions. However, if you compare this to what the Canon HV20 can achieve with gain on maximum and 25p shooting mode enabled, the HDR-HC9E's image is not as clean and detailed. A bluish grain is visible, which reduces clarity. With the light reduced still further (to the equivalent of a nearby candle), most of the colour information is lost, although dropping the shutter speed to 1/25th improves this considerably. However, the bluish grain also increases, further reducing detail.

Although the HDR-HDC9E offers great image quality in all but the worst illumination, Canon's HV20 beats it in this respect, and the very similar HV30 is likely to as well. The Canons also have more features for the budding professional, as well. So the HDR-HC9E is a great high-end choice for point-and-shoot HD video, but not one for more serious usage.

http://www.trustedreviews.com/camcorders/review/2008/03/08/Sony-HDR-HC9E-HDV-Camcorder/p3

Harika bir site teşekkür ederim.

İşten çıkıp eve varınca daha detaylı okuyabileceğim.

Eğer Sony biraz daha ucuz olsaydı o da overall'da 10 üzerinden 9 alacaktı.